VAC Home powered by Google    
U of M
 

Modes of Communication

 
 
 

Process  

Examples  

Reflection  

Resources  

 
 
 
 
 

Modes of Communication

 
 

Example 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

 
     
 

Examples of performance assessment units can be used or adapted to fit your classroom.

Level: Second Year


Theme: Are Stories Important?


Context: Students have been learning about and reading fables, fairy tales and children’s stories from the target culture. Students have also learned and practiced structures and relevant vocabulary that they need for describing and talking about the stories.

Students read a legend from the target culture in class.

Instruction to the student

Interpretive Task: Read the legend and then do a worksheet.
(The worksheet could ask students to identify the main character, the main point of the story, and one or two supporting details by underlining, or numbering the appropriate words. Students could also be asked to respond to questions by writing short answers. After you have checked worksheets for understanding, any misunderstandings about the legend are discussed with the class.)

Culture and Comparisons: In class, students are asked to think about the legend or story they read in the target language and the stories and legends they are familiar with from their language.

  • What are the similarities and differences in the stories?
  • How are the main characters portrayed in each culture?
  • What is the message individual stories/legends convey?
  • What do the stories tell about the way the target culture sees the world?
  • What seems important about each of the stories?

These questions can be a springboard for a rich discussion about cultural perspectives and comparisons as they relate to history, social values, materialism, altruism, values in child rearing, etc. as a reflection of culture and provides a connection to other subject areas such as history, social studies, and sociology. This discussion could be in English, to allow students to express ideas for which they may not have the target language. (The general note of caution about targeted use of English/native language is appropriate here, so that students do not rely on English/native language for discussion).

For an assignment, students are asked to think of their favorite story, legend or fairy tale and to write notes about it in the target language. The notes will be used in class for the interpersonal task.

Students should answer the following questions:

  • What is the story
  • When did they first hear it and from whom?
  • Why was it a favorite story?
  • What is the moral or main idea in the story
  • Who do they think would like it?

Interpersonal Task: In groups of four, students will tell about their favorite stories and answer questions. This task is interpersonal because the discussion is spontaneous. The questions the students answered the previous night, gave them an opportunity to reflect on their favorite story. Making notes provided students with some “thinking time” to be better prepared to participate in the conversation.

In assessing the students during the interpersonal task, a teacher could have fill out a self-assessment checklist or rubric for their participation in the discussion.

Students could also be evaluated using inner and outer circles, where students in the outer circle are assigned a student in the inner circle, directly across from him or her, to observe. Roles and places are reversed after the inner group completes the task assigned by the teacher. The second group of students discusses an assigned task. Discussions could also be videotaped for the teacher to view later.

Using a checklist, the teacher could move among the groups to rate the discussions in each group, or, the teacher cold also choose to pull several pairs of students aside and discuss the their story with them in detail.

Presentational Task: Draw a sequence of five pictures depicting the main events of a legend or story. Provide a heading and dialogue for each frame.

The text for the sequences will be edited and revised for accuracy. The editing may be first done as pair work with each partner being responsible for making corrections and allowing the teacher to give the final feedback before the students complete their final portrayal of a legend or fairy tale. Samples of student work and a rubric can be seen under Fables through Comics (French)

This task is presentational because the students are writing formal texts. Students write a rough draft for their sequences. After the rough draft is completed, the student receives feedback from the teacher and peers, makes the necessary changes and prepares a final draft.

Peer feedback: Peer editing works well, when students are responsible for one or two specific points in their editing task; for example, they could verify that the contents of the two paragraphs matched the instructions, or a student could check for subject verb agreement, correct genders, or that no words were left in English.

Give peers a short checklist (two or three items) to use in providing feedback. They can complete the checklist, write their comments, pose questions left unaddressed and sign their name to the checklist indicating that they have given appropriate feedback.

Teacher feedback: The teacher must remember that s/he is not writing the sequence for the student. Before accepting a rough draft, give the students a list of non-negotiables. Non-negotiables are items for which students can take complete responsibility. Rough drafts should not be accepted unless the non-negotiables have been met.

Examples of non-negotiables for this task might be:

  • grammar has been checked
  • each section has a title and an explanation

The interpersonal and presentational tasks can be evaluated using a rubric (see the Evaluation section for information on constructing rubrics), while the interpretive task is evaluated from the students’ worksheets.

 
     
 

Top of page

Next: Example 4

 
 
 
University of Minnesota
International Programs
Department Directory
U of M Search
OneStop: Student Info
Campus Maps
Second Languages and Cultures
Comparative and International
     Development Education
CARLA's Mission
CARLA Staff and Faculty
Graduate Assistant Employment Opportunities
National Language Resource Centers
CARLA Funding Sources
Contact Us
Get on Our Mailing List
What's New
Articulation of Language Instruction
Content Based Language Teaching With Technology (CoBaLTT)
Culture and Language Learning
English as a Second Language Learning and Teaching
Language Immersion Education and Research
Less Commonly Taught Languages (LCTL)
Maximizing Study Abroad
Pragmatics / Speech Acts
Second Language Assessment
Second Language Learning Strategies
Technology and Second Language Learning
Summer Institutes for Teachers
Conferences and Workshops
Lunchtime Presentations
CARLA Publications & Working Papers
Bibliography of Publications & Presentations
Less Commonly Taught Languages Databases
Language Proficiency Assessments
Language Proficiency Handbook for Teachers
Virtual Assessment Center
Content-based Instruction Resources
Immersion Education Archives
Resource Links for Language Teachers