VAC Home powered by Google    
U of M
 

What am I Assessing?

 
 
 

Process  

Examples  

Reflection  

Resources  

 
 
 
 
 

What am I Assessing?

 
 

Example 1 | 2 | 3

 
     
 

The following example explains how the NAEP graphic is represented in a performance assessment unit (ACTFL calls this an Integrated Performance Assessment):

Level: Beginner German (middle/high school)

Interpretive Task: Visit the website for the Hans und Sophie Scholl Gymnasium in Ulm, Germany. Find out where the school is located in Germany and who Hans and Sophie Scholl were. Include why you think

the school selected this name. After you visit the links under “organisation”, write down what you learned about the school. In what ways is it like or different from your school? (NOTE: This task is completed in English since it assesses how well the students understood the information on the website.)

Presentational Task: Using the Hans und Sophie Scholl Gymnasium “Homepage” as a model, design an introductory web page with links for your school.

Interpersonal Task: With a partner look at the websites you each designed. State what is the same and what is different between your websites and also between your websites and the website for Hans und Sophie Scholl Gymnasium.

This task targets a beginning language student in a middle school or high school. It could, however, be used by any level with two considerations.

First, the website reference would have to reflect the level of the students involved in the project. Second, the degree of simplicity/complexity demanded in the performance needs to reflect the language level of the students who are completing the assessment. Refer to the Evaluation section for information about designing rubrics and scoring guides.

As you consider this performance assessment, notice how the three tasks are interrelated. What the students learn in the Interpretive Mode can be used in the Presentational and Interpersonal Modes. What the students learn in the Interpretive and Presentational Modes is the basis for the Interpersonal Mode. The assessment is authentic: it uses a real website of a school in Germany and then asks the students to create their own websites.

The underpinning of the four ‘C’s is apparent.

The students learn about schools in France to increase their knowledge of German Culture. By reflecting on the name of the school, the students can gain greater understanding of the people of Germany and how they look at the world.

The students are asked to compare their school to the school in Germany, thereby addressing the Comparisons standard.
Using technology to visit and design a website models Connections. And via the Internet, the students are extending their learning beyond the classroom thus reflecting the Communities standard.

 
     
 

Top of page

Next: Example 2

 
 
 
University of Minnesota
International Programs
Department Directory
U of M Search
OneStop: Student Info
Campus Maps
Second Languages and Cultures
Comparative and International
     Development Education
CARLA's Mission
CARLA Staff and Faculty
Graduate Assistant Employment Opportunities
National Language Resource Centers
CARLA Funding Sources
Contact Us
Get on Our Mailing List
What's New
Articulation of Language Instruction
Content Based Language Teaching With Technology (CoBaLTT)
Culture and Language Learning
English as a Second Language Learning and Teaching
Language Immersion Education and Research
Less Commonly Taught Languages (LCTL)
Maximizing Study Abroad
Pragmatics / Speech Acts
Second Language Assessment
Second Language Learning Strategies
Technology and Second Language Learning
Summer Institutes for Teachers
Conferences and Workshops
Lunchtime Presentations
CARLA Publications & Working Papers
Bibliography of Publications & Presentations
Less Commonly Taught Languages Databases
Language Proficiency Assessments
Language Proficiency Handbook for Teachers
Virtual Assessment Center
Content-based Instruction Resources
Immersion Education Archives
Resource Links for Language Teachers