VAC Home powered by Google    
U of M
 

Evaluation

 
 
 

Process 

Introduction

Objective & subjective evaluation

Checklists

Rubrics

Examples  

Reflection  

Resources  

 
 
 
 
 

Evaluation

 
 

Process

 
     
 

Checklists

Checklists are good indicators of "can do–can't do" and "done–not done", but are less informative than scaled rubrics when assigning a grade. In general, checklists are not used to indicate the relative quality of a product or performance.

Use checklists:

  • To record observed performance. While students work in small groups, you might note whether or not individuals demonstrate ability or knowledge in some predetermined categories aligned to course content and objectives. For example, in a unit on leisure-time activities for Novice-level learners, a simple checklist might look like this:

Activities Checklist

Yes

No

Can name five sports

Yes

No

Can name five activities other than sports

Yes

No

Can create simple sentences about likes & dislikes regarding activities & sports

Yes

No

Can ask a question about what others do in their free time

  • For self-assessment. Students can use the above checklist to evaluate their own progress. The statements would be changed to "can do" statements of the type: "I can name five sports in German."
  • To keep track of progress over time, e.g., as an inventory of skills at the beginning and end of a course. This type of checklist might form part of a portfolio.

Receptive oral skills

Understands simple directions.

Understands simple sentences.

Understands simple yes/no questions.

Understands vocabulary appropriate to age.

Understands meaning of different intonation patterns.

Understands more complex directions.

Understands rapid speech.

Understands language in classroom situation.

Understands language of peers.

Adapted from Genesee, F. & Upshur, J.A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second-language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 88.

  • To specify the non-negotiables (D. Clementi, personal communication, October 2002) which will not be included in your qualitative criteria. For example, if a report is to be typed rather than handwritten, include this requirement on the checklist. Handwritten submissions do not meet your minimal requirements for a report, so the product is not ready to be evaluated. Giving the checklist to students early on allows them to be aware of, and responsible for, the non-negotiables. The example below is intended for self-assessment by students who wrote an essay about a story they read:

Essay - Non-negotiables

Yes

No

My paper is typed, double-spaced.

Yes

No

I wrote at least 500 words.

Yes

No

My paper has an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Yes

No

I included examples from the story.

Yes

No

I proofread my paper.

  • To help students fulfill task requirements. Giving learners a checklist of the steps to complete within a task can help them turn in a better performance. The example below illustrates a checlist that might be used with one draft of an essay in a multi-draft approach. This checklist focused on grammatical elements serves to: 1) allow the teacher to indicate to students where they need to direct attention at this point in the essay-writing process, and 2) remind students of what they are expected to verify before turning in their second draft. It would be difficult to give meaningful feedback about the content of the essay in a checklist, and it is assumed that students have other opportunities to receive comments from their teacher and/or peers.

Essay - Proofreading check - Draft 2

Length requirement

Spell-checked

Subject-verb agreement

Noun-adjective agreement

Verb conjugations

Advantages

  • Easy to construct and use.
  • Align closely with tasks.
  • Effective for self and peer assessment.
  • Make learners aware of task requirements, allowing them to self-monitor progress.
  • Useful for sharing information with parents and other stakeholders.

Disadvantages

  • Provide limited information about how to improve performance.
  • Do not indicate relative quality of performance.

(Brindley, 1989; Genesee & Upshur, 1996; Tedick, 2002; Underhill, 1987)

 

 
     
 

Top of page

Next: Rubrics

 
 
 
University of Minnesota
International Programs
Department Directory
U of M Search
OneStop: Student Info
Campus Maps
Second Languages and Cultures
Comparative and International
     Development Education
CARLA's Mission
CARLA Staff and Faculty
Graduate Assistant Employment Opportunities
National Language Resource Centers
CARLA Funding Sources
Contact Us
Get on Our Mailing List
What's New
Articulation of Language Instruction
Content Based Language Teaching With Technology (CoBaLTT)
Culture and Language Learning
English as a Second Language Learning and Teaching
Language Immersion Education and Research
Less Commonly Taught Languages (LCTL)
Maximizing Study Abroad
Pragmatics / Speech Acts
Second Language Assessment
Second Language Learning Strategies
Technology and Second Language Learning
Summer Institutes for Teachers
Conferences and Workshops
Lunchtime Presentations
CARLA Publications & Working Papers
Bibliography of Publications & Presentations
Less Commonly Taught Languages Databases
Language Proficiency Assessments
Language Proficiency Handbook for Teachers
Virtual Assessment Center
Content-based Instruction Resources
Immersion Education Archives
Resource Links for Language Teachers